the comparison of self-talking-based cognitive therapy considering the iranian-islamic models with common self-talking-based cognitive therapy on marital conflicts of women

the main purpose of present study was to comparison of self-talking-based cognitive therapy considering the iranian-islamic models with common self-talking-based cognitive therapy on marital conflicts of married women. this study was a semi-experimental research with post and pretest with control group. 42 women who referred to a counseling center in meybod city were selected by available sampling and then randomly assigned in 2 experiment and 1 control groups (2 participant cannot finished the study). the first experimental group received self-talking-based cognitive therapy considering the iranian-islamic models, and second experimental group received common self-talking-based cognitive therapy (both of them have 7 sessions). the control group didn&apos;t receive any intervention. before and after the experiment, all groups answer to marital conflict questionnaire. finally, data analyzed by one-way anova. the results show that both of interventions in experimental groups significantly decrease marital conflicts of participants, but intervention based on iranian-islamic models than intervention based on self-talking-based cognitive therapy have greater effect on improving of the marital conflicts (p< .01). therefore, we can conclude that in self-talking-based cognitive therapy, common models should be replaced by teachings witch roots in islamic and iranian models.